Academic Rights and Responsibilities – Graduate

Graduate Academic Rights and Responsibilities

Graduate Studies

Academic Integrity Statement

“As a member of the Shepherd University community of scholars, I will uphold the fundamental values of academic integrity: Honesty, Trust, Respect, Fairness, and Responsibility.”

Academic Rights and Responsibilities

All students, faculty, and staff are responsible for understanding and complying with the university’s stated academic requirements.

1. Student grades are based solely on academic performance as measured by the standards set forth in the course syllabus
2. Students should feel free to express their thoughts and opinions in an academic forum
3. Assignments must be completed by the student for whom the work is assigned and without unauthorized aid of any kind
4. Instructors shall encourage honest effort by exercising care in planning and supervising academic work
5. A student who does not comply with the university’s honesty standard may be subject to appropriate penalties imposed by the instructor, and even to academic probation, suspension, or dismissal
6. The policies regarding both academic standing and academic dishonesty are outlined in the Shepherd University Catalog.

Students who choose to enroll at Shepherd University have the following academic rights:

1. Access to the Shepherd University Catalog, which describes all academic program requirements including: required courses, total credit requirements, residence requirements, special program requirements, minimum grade point average requirements, probation standards, professional standards, and other pertinent information.
2. A written syllabus containing the academic requirements of, and the instructor’s expectations for the course
   • Course syllabi will be distributed by instructors of record, and should contain information pertaining to: attendance policies, grading procedures, course information, special requirements including field trips, extra costs, and other pertinent matters
   • Students have the right of appeal if they believe they have been  discriminated against due to: race, color, national origin, age, gender identity, familial or associational status, disabilities, religion, or sexual orientation

Academic Actions Imposed by the University

1. Shepherd University will take appropriate academic action when a student fails to maintain the academic standards of the university, or when there is evidence that a student has violated an academic policy. Students also have the right to appeal academic actions
2. Examples of situations requiring academic action would include the following.
   • Infraction of institutional academic standards, rules, and regulations as stated in the Shepherd University Catalog.
   • Academic dishonesty (e.g., plagiarism, cheating, falsifying records, etc.).
   • Failure to meet the standards required for continuing in a program of instruction, that leads to dismissal from that program.
3. Failure to maintain the university’s academic standards may result in the following student sanctions depending on the severity of the behavior:
   • Instructor Imposed Sanctions include the reduction of a grade, or the failure of a course, all of which may be applied to an individual. The maximum penalty a professor may impose is a grade of F in the course.
   • Academic Probation is a sanction imposed for failure to meet academic standards (see the Shepherd University Catalog).
   • Academic Suspension is the exclusion from all institutional activities for a definite stated period of time not to exceed one calendar year (see the Shepherd University Catalog).
   • Academic Dismissal is the termination of student status from some or all programs, including any right or privilege to receive a benefit, recognition, or certification.

Academic Actions Concerning Admissions and Credits

1. Institutional procedures for administering admission policies are detailed in the Shepherd University Catalog.
   • The School of Graduate and Professional Studies shall be responsible for administering admissions policies outlined in the Shepherd University Catalog related to graduate degrees and certificates.
     • Prospective students who fail to meet the academic standards necessary for admissions will be notified of their deficiencies.
     • Prospective students who wish to challenge or seek an exception to an admissions policy may petition the Graduate Council for an exception to the rules in particular cases.
   • The Office of the Registrar is responsible for administering the institutional academic standards as outlined in the Shepherd University Catalog.
     • The Office of Registrar will notify students who have deficiencies and fail to meet the minimum academic standards necessary for remaining in a given program.
     • Students wishing to challenge or seek an exception to a university policy may, in particular cases, petition the Graduate Council for an exception to the rules.
       • All petitions shall include required signatures on the appropriate petition.
       • All petitions will include a written statement of the reason that an exception to a policy should be granted.
2. Decisions of the Graduate Council may be appealed to the provost whose decision is final.

The Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee

1. The faculty pool utilized in this process consists of all faculty who sit on Graduate Council.
2. Members of the committee will hear cases involving grade appeals, academic dishonesty, and program suspensions/dismissals.

Student Grade Appeals

1. In any grade appeal procedure, establishing good cause for changing a final grade rests on the student.
2. Unless the student can offer convincing arguments to the contrary, good faith on the instructor’s part is presumed.
3. When supported by sufficient evidence, any of the following reasons shall constitute good cause for challenging a final grade
   • The grade was the result of discrimination
     • A successful appeal must demonstrate that the instructor did not apply a consistent standard to all students in the classroom.
     • The student making the appeal must show that the instructor did not apply the same grading standard to the student making the appeal that was applied to other students in the course.
   • The grade was awarded in an arbitrary or capricious manner.
   • The grade was the result of an error on the part of the professor in calculating, recording, or reporting a final grade.
4. None of the following shall constitute good cause for appealing a final grade:
   • Disagreement with the course requirements established by the professor,
   • Disagreement with the grading standards established by the professor,
   • Disagreement with the instructor’s judgment when applying grading standards, assuming that the instructor has made a reasonable effort to be fair and consistent in exercising that judgment,
   • The desire or need of the student to attain a particular grade,
   • Consequences that a student might face as the result of a grade award.
5. What constitutes standing in a grade appeal case?
   • In the grade appeal process, standing is defined as those parties who are directly linked to this action procedurally.
     • Those parties who have standing include the instructor and the student desiring a grade change,
     • Those parties who do not have standing include classmates, other instructors, other administrators, and family members.
   • Parties with standing shall be allowed to present oral testimony to the Graduate Council Academic Appeals Committee in the grade appeal process. All Graduate Council Academic Appeals Committee hearings should be record. Hearings may be conducted in person or virtually.
   • Relevant testimony from parties who do not have standing in the grade appeal process should be presented in the form of written statements that shall be made part of the official appeal file.
     • Committee members may invite other parties to be interviewed or to give testimony based on the written statements.
     • All written statements shall become part of the grade appeal file.

Grade Appeal Procedures

Step 1: Scheduling a Faculty-Student Conference.

1. • A student wishing to appeal a grade shall first confer in person or via video technology with the instructor of record (hereafter referred to as instructor) who assigned that grade.
     • The instructor-student conference shall take place within the first 10 class days of the regular semester immediately following the semester that the disputed grade was assigned (Summer sessions are not considered as regular semesters).
     • At the request of the student or the instructor, the program coordinator shall assign another graduate faculty member to witness the conference.
     • The reasons for questioning the grade shall be stated by the student, and the reasons for assigning that particular grade shall be explained by the instructor.
   • In a case where the instructor is not available for this conference (non-reappointment, retirement, death, extended absence from the area, or other debilitating circumstances), the instructor’s program coordinator shall act as the instructor of record.
   • Students who appeal a grade can expect one of two possible outcomes from the student-instructor conferences.
     • If the instructor finds that no grade change is justified, the student shall be notified at the end of the conference and in a follow-up email using the student’s Shepherd email address.
     • If the instructor does decide to change the grade, the instructor shall complete a change of grade form and file it with the registrar within 5 class days from the time that the conference occurs.

Step 2: The student appeals to the program coordinator.

1. • Following the instructor-student conference, a student receiving an unfavorable decision may file an appeal with the instructor’s program coordinator.
     • The appeal to the program coordinator must be in an email from the student’s Shepherd email address and filed within 5 class days of the instructor-student conference, or within the first 15 class days of the semester that the grade is eligible for appeal.
     • If the student fails to contact the program coordinator within 15 class days of the beginning of the appropriate semester, the instructor’s grade award shall be considered final.
   • The student’s grade appeal to the program coordinator must be in the form of a written memo or letter sent from the student’s Shepherd email address.
     • The appeal memo or letter must be copied to the instructor.
     • The student’s written statement must include a justification that should conform to at least one of the criteria listed above for making a grade appeal.
     • The appeal must include all completed assignments that have been returned to the student.
   • The instructor shall submit a written justification for the assigned grade with supporting documentation that includes any assignments that have not been returned to the student.
   • In order to make an equitable decision, the program coordinator may hold a hearing involving the instructor and the student desiring a grade change.
   • If the instructor is the Dean, then the following procedures shall be followed:
     • Following the faculty-student conference, step 2 shall occur.
     • If applicable, step 3 will be skipped and the case will proceed to step 4.
   • Within 10 class days of receiving the student’s appeal, the program coordinator shall provide both the student and the instructor with a written notice of the coordinator’s decision.
     • The written notice should give the reasons for the decision and may be given to the parties verbally but also sent to Shepherd email addresses.
     • Following notification of the coordinator’s decision to all parties, the program coordinator shall forward the original grade appeal file to the dean of graduate and professional studies.
       • The file should include a copy of the decision and all written materials including notes from oral investigations that were used for reaching the decision.
       • The School of Graduate and Professional Studies shall retain a copy of the files for 5 years.
     • Both the student and the instructor have the right to appeal the program coordinator’s decision to the dean of graduate and professional studies.
     • If the program coordinator’s review decides that a change in grade is warranted, and the instructor agrees with the decision, the instructor shall file a change of grade form with the registrar within 10 class days of the date of the decision.
     • If the program coordinator’s review decides that a change in grade is warranted, but the instructor does not consent to the change, the program coordinator shall automatically forward the appeal to the dean of graduate and professional studies.

1. Step 3: The Student Appeals to the Dean
   • A student or an instructor may appeal the program coordinator’s decision to the dean of graduate and professional studies within 5 class days of being notified of the program coordinator’s decision.
     • The appeal memo or letter must be copied to the program coordinator and the instructor using their Shepherd email address.
     • The appeal shall be in writing and shall contain the student’s reasons for appealing the program coordinator’s decision.
   • Upon receiving an appeal, the dean shall review the appeal file.
     • In arriving at a decision, the dean should consider the written appeal, the instructor’s written response, and the program coordinator’s written report.
       • The dean may also consider the student’s written work for the course in question.
       • In order to make an equitable decision, the dean may hold a hearing involving the instructor and the student desiring a grade change.
     • The dean shall communicate the decision and the justification to the student, the instructor, and program coordinator within 10 class days of receiving the student’s appeal using Shepherd email addresses.
   • Both the student and the instructor have the right to appeal the decision of the dean to the Graduate Council.
   • If the dean’s review decides that a change in grade is warranted, and the instructor is in agreement, the instructor shall file a change of grade form with the Office of the Registrar within 10 class days of the date of the decision.
   • If the dean’s review decides that a change in grade is warranted, but the instructor does not consent to the change, the dean shall automatically forward the appeal file to the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee.

Step 4: Petition to the Graduate Council.

• • A student or instructor may appeal the dean’s decision to the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee, by filing a written statement using their Shepherd email address with the School of Graduate and Professional Studies within 5 business days of receiving the dean’s letter.
    • Within 5 class days of receiving the written appeal, the dean shall notify the program coordinator and the instructor that an appeal has been filed.
    • Within 5 class days of receiving an appeal, the Dean will:
      • Provide the student with a list of faculty members who serve on the Graduate Council.
      • Instruct the student to strike 2 names within 3 business days.
      • Submit the remaining names to the instructor to strike 2 names within 3 business days.
      • Appoint 3 of the remaining names to the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee for the current grade appeal,.
      • Appoint one of the 3 faculty members as chair for this appeal process.
    • The Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee may consider all materials in the appeal file constructed by the dean (i.e., the student’s original appeal, the instructor’s written justification, the program coordinator’s written report, the dean’s written report, the student’s written work for the course, and all other documents the dean may have used in reaching a decision).
      • The student and the instructor shall each be entitled to submit additional written statements for consideration by the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee.
      • The Graduate Council Academic Appeals Committee shall hold a formal hearing, including all parties having standing (see above), and should address the following:
        • Questions from members of the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee.
        • Cross examination of witnesses by both parties
        • Additional inquiries that the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee deem necessary or beneficial to determine a successful outcome.
      • The Graduate Council Academic Appeals Committee shall reach a decision no later than the last day of regular classes before the final exam period of the semester when the appeal was filed.
        • Within 3 business days following the decision, the student, the instructor, the program coordinator, the dean, and provost, and shall be given written notice of the committee’s decision.
        • If the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee decides that a grade change is not justified, the student may appeal the decision of the Graduate Council Appeal Committee to the provost within 5 business days of the receipt of the decision letter.
        • If the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee decides that a grade change is justified, and with the instructor’s agreement, the instructor shall complete and submit a change of grade form to the Office of the Registrar within 5 business days following this decision.
        • If the Graduate Council Appeal Committee decides that a change in grade is warranted, but the instructor does not consent to the change, the instructor may appeal the decision of the Graduate Council Appeal Committee to the provost with 5 business days of the receipt of the decision letter. If the instructor does not appeal the decision, the Committee chair will instruct the Registrar to make the appropriate grade change.

Step 5: A decision of the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee may be appealed to the provost by the instructor or student, whose decision will be regarded as final.  The final decision of the provost will be sent certified mail.

Unusual Circumstances in Processing Grade Appeals

• • Some grade appeal cases may present practical obstacles for pursuing the procedures precisely, as outlined above:
  • An instructor may be absent from campus during the applicable appeal period, or the student may have an overwhelmingly compelling reason for a rapid decision
  • A last semester student’s qualification to graduate may depend upon the outcome of a currently received grade.
  • In such circumstances, the dean of graduate and professional studies has the discretion to modify the procedures, as little as possible, to accommodate the special requirements of the situation.
  • In exercising this discretion, the dean must attempt to adhere to the spirit of the procedures outlined above
  • The dean will commit to writing and distribute these exceptional rules to parties having standing.

Academic Integrity Procedures

Section 1. Instructors will clearly state their policy for Academic Integrity Violations in their course syllabus. Any student, administrator, staff, or faculty member may bring an allegation of an academic integrity violation against a student. Any individual making an allegation of an academic integrity violation has the responsibility to demonstrate that a preponderance of evidence indicates that a violation has occurred.

• A student charged with an academic integrity violation shall be accorded the presumption of innocence
• Consistent with the stated process articulated below, all allegations of academic integrity violations are to be reported by the course instructor to the Dean of Students Office, Registrar, and to the program coordinator. Instructors shall contact the Dean of Students and Registrar to confirm a student’s prior violation status prior to making an allegation of an academic integrity violation. Generally, any second violation of academic integrity policy may be grounds for suspension or expulsion from the university

Section 2. The instructor must carefully evaluate the evidence leading to an allegation of an academic integrity violation and the severity of the offense prior to electing an instructor-imposed outcome.

• The instructor of record must notify the student of an academic integrity violation which includes the context of the allegation, the instructor-imposed outcome, and steps to address the allegation including appeal procedures within five (5) business days via university email in accordance with due process. The instructor will copy the Dean of Students, Registrar, and their program coordinator on this message.
• If the allegation is the first documented allegation, the process proceeds as written below.  If a student has been found responsible for a previous academic integrity violation, the process is addressed through the Dean of Students Office in collaboration with the instructor.
• Instructor-imposed outcomes  for academic integrity violations  may include requiring work to be rewritten and resubmitted; lowering a grade; reducing the grade on the assignment up to a grade of “0” (zero); advising the withdrawal of a student from a class; and assigning a student a failing grade for the course in which the academic integrity violation occurred. Additionally, the instructor may recommend institutional action to the Dean of Students Office.
• For a first-time academic integrity allegation, an instructor may impose a penalty no greater than a failing grade for the course

Section 3. If the student accepts responsibility and the instructor-imposed outcomes, the instructor must provide the Dean of Students, Registrar, and program coordinator written description of the academic integrity violation and the outcome.

Section 4. If the allegation of an academic integrity violation is denied, the accused student has five (5) business days to contact the instructor of record to request a conference. If the student does not respond to the instructor’s allegation of an   academic integrity violation or does not contact the instructor within five (5) business days, the instructor-imposed outcome shall be imposed, and the reported violation is thereafter maintained on the student’s record by the Dean of Students and Registrar.

• When dealing with an allegation of an academic integrity violation, the student may request a conference with the instructor in order to discuss the allegation and be granted the opportunity to present statements and documentation on their own behalf. During this conference, the instructor may choose to uphold their allegation and instructor-imposed outcomes, modify the instructor-imposed outcomes, or rescind their allegation.
• If the decision of the instructor is to uphold allegations, move to Section 5.
• If the decision of the instructor is to modify the instructor-imposed outcomes, the student may choose to accept the modified outcomes or continue to Section 5.
• If the decision of the instructor is to rescind the allegation, notification in writing to the student, Dean of Students, and Registrar should be notified of these outcomes and the assignment will be graded assuming no academic integrity violation was committed.

Section 5. Allegations of an academic integrity violation in a specific course that cannot be resolved by the instructor and the student involved should be referred to the instructor’s program coordinator. If the instructor involved in the academic integrity allegation is a department chair, the academic dean responsible for the department shall act in the capacity of a department chair for the purposes of the conference. Conflicts of interest may be referred to the academic dean or other department chairs/program coordinators as appropriate.

A Conference with the Program Coordinator may be initiated by a request from either the student, the instructor involved, or by the department chair acting on a complaint from any member of the academic community. The conference must take place in an agreed modality (either in-person or virtually) within ten (10) business days of the department chair first receiving a request from either a student or an instructor

• This conference does not constitute a hearing on the student’s responsibility for academic dishonesty
• The purpose of the program coordinator conference shall be to clarify procedures, mediate the conference and information presented
• The coordinator may review the evidence and recommend particular courses of action that are acceptable to both the student and the instructor
• The coordinator may not overturn an instructor-imposed outcome without the instructor’s consent
• The program coordinator conference cannot result in any penalties being imposed on a student beyond those previously described as instructor- imposed outcome

If, at the end of the conference, the student accepts responsibility for the alleged academic integrity violation and agrees to accept the outcomes proposed by the instructor, those outcomes will be implemented.

• The program coordinator should obtain a written statement from the student who agrees to the outcomes that will be imposed as a result of the conference.
• The program coordinator shall forward copies of this written statement, along with a description of the offense and the instructor-imposed sanctions, to the registrar and to the Dean of Students.

If, at the end of the conference, the student denies responsibility for the alleged academic integrity violation, the chair shall contact the provost to schedule a hearing by the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee

• The student may only appeal the allegation of an academic integrity violation itself and not the outcomes imposed for academic integrity violations
• A student who accepts responsibility for an alleged academic integrity violation but disagrees with the instructor-imposed outcome cannot appeal under the academic integrity policies
• A student must appeal a disagreement with an instructor-imposed sanction under the grade appeal procedures detailed in the Academic Appeals Section.
• The student’s initial meeting with the instructor shall count as the meeting with the instructor under the grade appeal policy

At the end of the conference if either the faculty member or the department chair deems that the case warrants further disciplinary action, the chair shall contact the Dean of Students to ascertain procedures for a violation under the Student Code of Conduct. However, all allegations of academic integrity violations are to be reported to the Dean of Students and Registrar to establish the centralized record of such violations.

Section 6. A student who accepts a failing grade as a result of an academic integrity violation, shall not be permitted to withdraw from that course, even if the failing grade is given prior to that semester’s official withdrawal deadline.

• A student who receives a failing grade in a course as the result of an academic integrity violation and chooses to appeal the grade shall not be allowed to withdraw from the course unless the appeal is resolved in the student’s favor.
• A student who is in the process of appealing an alleged academic integrity violation has the right to remain enrolled in the class in which the allegation was made until the completion of the appeal process.

Section 7: Allegations of academic integrity violations that are not resolved by the conference with the program coordinator should be referred to the provost.

• Upon receiving a request for a hearing, the provost shall constitute a three-member hearing board from the pool of faculty members composing the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee following the procedure outlined in the Academic Appeals section.
• The chair of the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee shall present to the student and to the person making the allegation of an academic integrity violation, written notification of the allegation, including at least the following items:
  • A written list of the allegations
  • A statement that a hearing will be held together with a notice of the date, time, and place of the hearing
  • A clear statement of the information, data, and evidence directly supporting the allegation
    • A statement advising the student of their rights, which include:
      • The student’s right to the presumption of innocence until responsibility can be established through a preponderance of evidence
      • The student’s right to bring witnesses, to question the accuser, and to question any of the accuser’s witnesses
      • The student’s right to bring an advisor to the proceedings to monitor due process
      • The advisor may consult with the student but may not speak on behalf of the student
      • The advisor may not otherwise participate directly in the proceedings unless given specific permission to do so by the Academic Appeal Committee

The Graduate Council Academic Appeals Committee shall review all relevant evidence in the case to determine if the student is responsible or not responsible for an academic integrity violation.

• The committee shall interview the original instructor and the student against whom the allegations have been brought
• The committee may seek additional information and may interview witnesses whose testimony is relevant to the allegation of an academic integrity violation
• The student and the instructor have the right to bring witnesses and to question witnesses brought by the other party or by the committee
• All proceedings in the hearing must be recorded by the committee chair; either party to the dispute may request a copy of the recording
• Within ten (10) business days after the conclusion of the hearing, the Academic Appeal Committee shall send a written notice of its decision to both parties in the dispute, the provost, and the appropriate department chair

If the Committee determines that the student is responsible for an academic integrity violation:

• The instructor-imposed outcomes shall be imposed
• The committee chair shall send written notification to the registrar and to the Dean of Students

If the committee determines that the student is not responsible, then the instructor shall be required to reevaluate the student’s work with the assumption that the Academic Integrity policy has not been violated.

• If the student is found not responsible and their outcome was a lowered or failing grade based on the allegation of an academic integrity violation, the instructor shall reevaluate the student’s final grade and, if necessary, submit a grade-change form
• A student found not responsible for an allegation of an academic integrity violation shall be permitted to withdraw from the course in which the charge was made, even if the withdrawal deadline has passed or a final grade has been awarded
• The hearing may only rule on the factual question of whether or not a violation of the academic integrity policy has occurred has occurred
• The committee is not authorized to rule on the appropriateness of instructor-imposed outcomes once the student’s responsibility has been established
• The committee is not authorized to impose any outcomes on the student beyond those initially imposed by the instructor

Either the student or the faculty member may appeal the decision of the committee to the president of the university, whose decision shall be final.

Section 8. When brought by anyone other than the instructor of record, an allegation of an academic integrity violation involving a student or students in a specific course should be made to the instructor’s program coordinator who may take one of two actions:

• The program coordinator may refer the matter to the course instructor for appropriate action following the procedures outlined in Section 2.
• The program coordinator may contact the student and the instructor directly and initiate a conference as outlined in Section 5
  • An allegation of an academic integrity violation that does not involve a regular academic course (e.g., falsifying records, cheating on a standardized test) should be made to the Dean of Students, who will either contact the appropriate academic units or initiate action as a policy violation under the Student Code of Conduct.
  • Separate from instructor-imposed sanctions, the Dean of Students has jurisdiction to take institutional action under the Student Code of Conduct policies and procedures, which may include suspension or expulsion, in response to an allegation of an academic integrity violation. In the case of a first offense, substantial deference is accorded to the intent of the instructor. In the case of a second offense, suspension or expulsion may be an appropriate institutional sanction.
  • Separate from instructor-imposed sanctions, some academic programs at Shepherd are limited enrollment programs and/or have specific standards of professionalism associated with the course. If the student is enrolled in such a program and is found culpable of academic dishonesty under this policy, the Dean of Students shall give notice of the incident to the program coordinator of the student’s program. The program may choose to proceed with Academic Action, as provided for in Section VIII.
  • Any individual making a charge of academic dishonesty has the responsibility to demonstrate that a preponderance of evidence indicates that a violation has occurred
  • Charges of academic dishonesty in a specific course that cannot be resolved by the instructor and the student involved should be referred to the instructor’s program coordinator
  • A program coordinator conference can be initiated by a request from either the student or the instructor involved or by the program coordinator acting on a complaint from any member of the academic community
    • The conference should take place in person within 10 days of the program coordinator first receiving a request from either a student or an instructor to hold it
    • This conference does not constitute a hearing on the student’s responsibility for academic dishonesty
    • The purpose of the program coordinator conference shall be to clarify procedures and possible sanctions for both the student and the instructor and to coordinate further appeals
    • The coordinator may review the evidence and recommend particular courses of action that are acceptable to both the student and the instructor
    • The coordinator may not overturn an instructor-imposed sanction without the instructor’s consent
    • The program coordinator conference cannot result in any penalties being imposed on a student beyond those previously described as instructor- imposed sanctions

If, at the end of the conference, the student admits responsibility for the act of academic dishonesty and agrees to accept the sanctions proposed by the instructor and the program coordinator, those sanctions will be implemented

• The program coordinator should obtain a written statement from the student who agrees to the sanctions that will be imposed as a result of the conference.
• The program coordinator shall forward copies of this written statement, along with a description of the offense and the instructor-imposed sanctions, to the registrar and to the Dean of Students.

If, at the end of the conference, the student denies responsibility for an act of academic dishonesty, the coordinator shall contact the provost to schedule a hearing by the Academic Appeal Committee

• The student may only appeal the charge of academic dishonesty itself and not the sanctions imposed for academic dishonesty once responsibility has been established
• A student who admits responsibility in a case of academic dishonesty but disagrees with the instructor-imposed sanctions cannot appeal under the academic integrity policies
• A student must appeal a disagreement with an instructor-imposed sanction under the grade appeal procedures detailed in Section VI
• The student’s initial meeting with the instructor shall count as the meeting with the instructor under the grade appeal policy

At the end of the conference if either the faculty member or the program coordinator deems that the case warrants further disciplinary action, the chair shall contact the Dean of Students to ascertain procedures for a violation under the Student Code of Conduct. However, all willful incidents of academic dishonesty are to be reported to the Dean of Students to establish the centralized record of such offenses.

If the instructor involved in the academic dishonesty dispute is a program coordinator, the dean shall act in the capacity of a program coordinator for the purposes of the conference

• Academic dishonesty disputes that are not resolved by the conference with the program coordinator should be referred to the provost.
• Upon receiving a request for a hearing, the provost shall constitute a three- member hearing board from the pool of faculty members composing the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee following the procedure outlined in Section VI
• The chair of the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee shall present to the student and to the person making the charge of academic dishonesty, written notification of the charges, including at least the following items:
  • A written list of the charges
  • A statement that a hearing will be held together with a notice of the date, time, and place of the hearing
  • A clear statement of the information, data, and evidence directly supporting the proffered charges
  • A statement advising the student of his or her rights, which include:
  • The student’s right to the presumption of innocence until responsibility can be established through a preponderance of evidence
  • The student’s right to bring witnesses, to question the accuser, and to question any of the accuser’s witnesses
  • The student’s right to bring an advisor to the proceedings to monitor due process
  • The advisor may consult with the student but may not speak on behalf of the student
  • The advisor may not otherwise participate directly in the proceedings unless given specific permission to do so by the Graduate Council Academic Appeal Committee

The Graduate Council Academic Appeals Committee shall review all relevant evidence in the case to determine if the student is responsible or not responsible for the act of academic dishonesty.

• The committee shall interview the original instructor and the student against whom the charges have been brought
• The committee may seek additional information and may interview witnesses whose testimony is relevant to the charge of academic dishonesty
• The student and the instructor have the right to bring witnesses and to question witnesses brought by the other party or by the committee
• All proceedings in the hearing must be recorded, and either party to the dispute may request a copy of the tape recording at his/her own expense
• Within 10 days after the conclusion of the hearing, the Academic Appeal Committee shall send a written notice of its decision to both parties in the dispute, the provost, and the appropriate department chair

If the Committee determines that the student is responsible for the act of academic dishonesty:

• The instructor-imposed sanctions shall be imposed
• The committee chair shall send written notification to the registrar and to the Dean of Students

If the committee determines that the student is not responsible, then the instructor shall be required to reevaluate the student’s work with the assumption that it is not the result of an act of academic dishonesty.

• An instructor who has awarded the student found not responsible a lowered or failing grade based on the charge of academic dishonesty shall be instructed to reevaluate the student’s final grade and, if necessary, submit a grade-change form
• A student found not responsible for an act of academic dishonesty shall be permitted to withdraw from the course in which the charge was made, even if the withdrawal deadline has passed or a final grade has been awarded
• The hearing may only rule on the factual question of whether or not an act of academic dishonesty has occurred
• The committee is not authorized to rule on the appropriateness of instructor-imposed sanctions once the student’s responsibility has been established
• The committee is not authorized to impose any sanctions on the student beyond those initially imposed by the instructor

Either the student or the faculty member may appeal the decision of the committee to the president of the university, whose decision shall be final.

Academic Integrity Procedures for Selected  Programs

1. Several departments at Shepherd University (which include, but are not limited to, teacher education and nursing) offer programs requiring a student to meet certain academic and professional standards in order to continue enrollment in the program
2. When a point is reached in the programmatic study where a student might not qualify to continue in the program, the following procedures shall be followed

• The student shall be counseled about their lack of progress by one or more faculty members responsible for the program
• When it appears to one or more instructors that a student has failed to meet the standards for continuing in the program, that instructor or those instructors shall notify the department chair and a formal review of the student’s status shall be conducted by the department members, who shall determine whether the student may continue in the program
• If the department decides upon programmatic retention, the student shall be advised in writing of the necessary steps, if any, which will be required as a condition of retention

If the department decides upon programmatic dismissal, the following procedures will be followed:

• The student will be informed of the department’s decision in writing
• The student will be notified of the available procedures for appealing the decision
• The student will be allowed to complete coursework begun before the programmatic dismissal but will not be permitted to enroll in any further courses in the program unless permitted to do so by a successful appeal

1. The Student Appeals to the Academic Dean
   • The student may appeal the decision of the department to the dean of the school in which the program is offered, following the steps outlined in Section VI.
   • Upon receiving an appeal, the dean shall follow the steps outlined in Section VI.
   • Both the student and the department have the right to appeal the decision of the dean to the Academic Appeal Committee
2. Petition to the Academic Appeal Committee
   • A student or the department may appeal the dean’s decision to the Academic Appeal Committee, following the steps in Section VI.
   • Upon receiving an appeal, the provost and the Academic Appeal Committee shall follow the steps outlined in Section VI.

Attendance Policy

Students are expected to attend class and to know and understand the specific attendance policies established by their professors. Attendance policy for a given class is established by the professor. The professor will state the attendance policy in the course syllabus. Professors will make reasonable accommodations for occasional, unavoidable absences based on highly legitimate grounds. Professors will determine the most appropriate means of compensating for work unavoidably and legitimately missed in their classes. To be eligible for such substitute evaluation, students are responsible for discussing any absences with their professors; such discussions must occur in advance of foreseeable absences and as soon as possible following unpredictable ones.

Students are expected to plan their class, work, and personal schedules to avoid potential conflicts. Legitimate reasons for class absences include documented and/or instances of the following 1) death in the immediate family; 2) incapacitating illness or injury (not including any nonemergency doctors’ appointments that could be scheduled at other times); 3) field trips required for other classes, intercollegiate competitions, or activities involving official representation of Shepherd University; 4) hazardous, weather-induced driving conditions.

At the graduate level, graduate student absences are addressed in course syllabi and other program-specific handbooks (where applicable) which could include an Absentee Notice from the Dean of Students.

A student’s evaluation in a course is the professor’s responsibility. A grade decision in a course must be made by the professor prior to the initiation of a grade appeal. A student who believes a grade has been adversely affected by a professor’s inappropriate implementation of the attendance policy may pursue a grade appeal at the close of the semester.

Special Circumstances

1. Students requesting any disability related accommodation should contact the Office of Accessibility Services at 304-876-5122. This includes, but is not limited to, students with visual or hearing impairments, students with diagnosed disabilities that affect their learning and in need of academic accommodations, and students requesting specific housing accommodations for health-related reasons. Students must be registered with the Office of Accessibility Services and present their certified accommodation letter to each of their instructors as early in the semester as possible prior to using any granted academic accommodation. In consultation with the student, the professor can develop a plan to accommodate any student absences.
2. In rare instances a student may suffer an unanticipated medical problem or military- service obligation requiring complete absence from school over an extended period (i.e., weeks rather than days). Such a situation will create the need to confer with professors as soon as is feasible. A professor may be able to design alternative assignments that can be done independently. However, some courses by their nature do not lend themselves to compensation for prolonged periods of missed classes and assignments. For such classes, the alternatives may be limited to either a Withdrawal or an Incomplete specifically mandating that the student take some or all of the relevant course when it is next offered. In such circumstances, the dean of graduate and professional studies as representative of the graduate council will generally be agreeable to any necessary waivers regarding institutional deadlines regarding withdrawals or incompletes so long as l) the student’s petition clearly and fully explains the situation calling for the waiver, 2) appropriate documentation is presented, 3) the request is supported in writing by both the professor and the student’s advisor, and 4) the student’s request is made in a timely manner (i.e., as soon as possible given the circumstances and not substantially after the fact).