Students graduating from the program shall be able to demonstrate the ability to design, implement, and evaluate services that facilitate targeted human experiences and that embrace personal and cultural dimensions of diversity.
PROGRAM SPECIFIC LEARNING OUTCOME
Students will demonstrate an understanding of the concepts of inclusion and diversity in the recreation, leisure, and sport industry.
COAPRT Outcome – Service and Experience
Evidence Learning Outcome (7.02:01) – RECR 336: Disability Paper
Performance Measure (7.02:02) – Indirect: students are required to prepare a report focused on a specific disability. The report will include the definition and description of the disability, safety factors, and program adaptations to consider when planning and leading recreational activities. Details and Rubric
Performance Levels/Metrics – 75% of students will be assessed on their disability paper at a level of “Identified clearly or Identified exceptionally” (80%) or higher.
Assessment Results (7.02.03) – Due to past results, it was determined that the previous reflection paper did not adequately measure the students understanding of inclusion. Therefore, the comprehensive disability paper was added to measure a broader dimension (of inclusion and diversity) targeting human experiences.
CPI: Evidence of Programmatic Decisions (7.02:04) – While new to this specific outcome the measure has been used previously. Results
PROGRAM SPECIFIC LEARNING OUTCOME
Students will possess the ability to design, plan, implement, and evaluate a variety of programs and activities in fields of Recreation, sport, outdoor recreation and/or therapeutic recreation related to diversity and inclusion.
COAPRT Outcome – Service and Experience
Evidence Learning Outcome (7.02:01) – RECR 336: Inclusive Activity
Performance Measure (7.02:02) -Direct: students will be measured on their ability to design, plan, implement, and evaluate an inclusive activity focused on diversity and inclusion. Details and Rubric
Performance Levels/Metrics – 75% of students will be assessed on their ability to design, plan, implement, and evaluate at a level of “acceptable” (80%) or higher.
Assessment Results (7.02.03) – Due to past results, it was determined that the inclusive model did not fully measure the student ability to design, plan, implement, and evaluate inclusive programs. Previous results from the inclusive activity have indicated high success rates of student understanding of cultural dimensions of diversity and inclusion. A stronger focus will know be placed on the design, planning, implementation and evaluation process.
CPI: Evidence of Programmatic Decisions (7.02:04) – While new to this specific outcome the measure has been used previously. Results