Home          News          Commentary          Lifestyles          Sports          Staff          Contact Us          Advertising

 

COMMENTARY


Annexation, Anyone?

By John Doyle

I read the Picket every week and I love it. I particularly like the opinion pieces. While I often disagree with some of the conclusions, the factual basis for most opinions is sound. As the late senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan was fond of saying, "everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." Picket opinion articles regularly follow that dictum.

However, In last week's edition there appeared to be considerable misunderstanding (in more than one article) about the proposed annexation of part of Shepherd University by the town of Shepherdstown.

I don't have a position on this question because I should not have one. I'm not a resident of the town nor am I connected in some way with the university. Were I to express a position on this question, I would properly be regarded as an interloper.

However, since municipal annexation falls under the general heading of "land use," which is one of the three areas of state law I've focused on in the State Legislature, I may be able to help provide some facts.

Read full article


 

Reader Feedback

Letters to the Editor

Commentary Features

West of Washington

Ravings of a Madman

Everyone has a Story

Picket Editorial

More Commentary Articles

Democrats continue to misuse the "race card"

Obama's feelings toward gay community unclear

Sleeplessness survey reveals more serious health and economic issues in West Virginia

Liberal media still spreading myths about the tea party

Campus annexation fueled by greed, politics

Women in US military battle sexual abuse

Obama's avoidance of Fox causes suspicion and anger

Why I'm for (and against) gay marriage

Social networking sites are guilty pleasure for many

Obama deserves patience, but not a prize

Grad school prospects seem dim due to lack of preparedness

Weird Signs and Strange Sites

Americans easily deceived by right-wing radical Beck

 

Residence Life policies: strict or outright unfair?

By Audra Costlow

The policies at Shepherd for moving off-campus seem unusually strict. In order to "qualify" for such a move, a full-time, unmarried student without dependents must have completed at least 96 credit hours or must have family, with whom they would presumably be living, within 60 miles of Shepherd's campus. Unless a student meets these conditions, they are required to live in on-campus housing, or they face consequences, which can include mandatory classes and meetings, expensive fines, and holds placed on registration accounts. 

This policy is absurd, and it reveals a lack of trust on the part of the university. While I can understand the concern of Shepherdstown residents over an influx of students living in rentals and causing noise and messes in town, the university seems solely motivated by money. The costs of housing and mandatory meal plans are a major reason why students move off-campus in the first place, but the prices of these requirements continue to increase alongside tuition. Also, students who get jobs in the area often want to live off-campus to ensure having a place to live year-round, but according to Residence Life, this is not a valid justification for living independently.

Read full article

Breast cancer segment causes undue controversy

By Audra Costlow

October was Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and countless organizations and agencies participated in raising funds and providing education to support this cause. Unfortunately, controversy arose in our area when news channel ABC 7 WJLA featured a segment on self-examination which showed a nude breast, nipple included.

Some protesters of this segment believed that ABC was simply staging a ratings stunt by revealing that they would show breasts on the air and then running the segment during their 5 p.m. and 11 p.m. time slots. Others who were against the segment felt it was inappropriate to show a breast on television when children could be watching.

What these critics fail to realize is that breast cancer is a serious problem, that many women do not know how to properly examine their own breasts, and that breasts are simply a part of the female anatomy and are present to provide nutrients to offspring. The fact that breasts are still so taboo in the United States is laughable and pathetic.

Read full article